Audacity: free recording software

by Scott Andrew on March 7, 2006 · 9 comments

Cash-strapped musicians who want to do computer-based home recording might want to look into Audacity, a totally free multitrack recording program that runs on Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. I haven’t used it myself, but after looking at the feature list I just might give it a whirl.

Related posts:

  1. REAPER: almost-free recording software
  2. Roll-your-own recording studio
  3. How to get advice on your music industry career for less than ten bucks a month.
  4. The power of audacity and other networking tips
  5. Joe’s Tweets for 2007-12-17

{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }

C-Dub March 7, 2006 at 8:07 pm

I have used audacity for editing mp3 and wave files. Works pretty good.

Reply

shane March 7, 2006 at 8:38 pm

audacity works well, but for a more advanced freeware DAW try ardour. http://www.ardour.org works on mac and linux systems… supports most audio interface solutions .

Reply

David Hooper March 7, 2006 at 9:17 pm

I’ve used it for years and love it. In fact, when I upgraded hardware, I specifically chose stuff that would work with this program. It’s very good and easy to use.

Reply

Jeff Epstein March 8, 2006 at 9:07 am

Yes, I use Audacity too on my laptop…it is what I record all my worktapes on. If I make a demo, I can normalize, compress, EQ, echo, basically do anything I need to do. Frankly, at this point I can’t imagine ever needing Cool Edit or ProTools…unless you are a professional engineer, and then you might as well hire a studio.

Reply

Scott Sweeney March 8, 2006 at 2:45 pm

Although this software does a good, but basic, recording job, I still think you would be best served investing in some kind of cheaper Protools rig. There is no reason to short change your recordings, I can’t imagine being able to release any sort of professional recording using this peice of software. UNLESS you have the professional plugins to match and which Protools gives you a nice supply of when you purchase it. And an MBox is so cheap these days, why even bother with a free recorder.

Reply

Scott Andrew March 8, 2006 at 10:38 pm

“I can’t imagine being able to release any sort of professional recording using this peice of software.”

Hmm, that sounds like a challenge to me ;) A full-length release done entirely with free software? A pretty remarkable acheivement.

Reply

Taiwan Locke September 7, 2006 at 3:21 pm

“I can’t imagine being able to release any sort of professional recording using this peice of software.�

The hell with that. I’ve used Audacity for almost a year now and released 2 professionally recorded hip-hop mixtapes, and i love it. Audacity is yet free and very easy to use. Do some real work with it and then criticise. I’ve used Acid, Cubase, Sonar, Protools Free, and N-Track and none of these “pieces of software” even come close to the accuracy and sound quality that come with Audacity. So yeah, I think that sounds like a challange to me also. “Holla”

Reply

castro May 8, 2008 at 11:42 pm

what is the best way to record my own vocals over beats and make them sound somewhat professional with mixing and mastering
basically not sounding like a recording of a recording

Reply

eddie July 26, 2008 at 12:52 am

h0w d0 i make my vocals sound profesonal.? when i record vocals and quick mix it they have too much bass.. h0w do i make them have m0re treble than bass..?

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: